Flask and Python 3

Juan Christian juan0christian at gmail.com
Thu Sep 25 20:35:32 CEST 2014

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:

> Actually, what most of the comments are agreeing on is that videos
> need their transcripts. Without them, they suck. Most videos don't
> have any sort of transcript. Ergo, most videos suck.

I'm not talking about "360p 3min kid's tutorial form Youtube" here, when I
say video tutorial, it's implied that every video that I talked about have
1. The source-code (if programming/code related), 2. The transcripts and in
some cases even 3. PDF version of the video. In this topic my code went
wrong because I did it on my own, and not crtlc/crtlv from the original
source-code, and it was a stupid typo error

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick <
kwpolska at gmail.com> wrote:

> Also, video tutorials for code (as well as analog books) lack a very
> important feature: copy-paste.  Nobody likes retyping large passages
> of code.  Especially because it’s error-prone.

Coursera, edX, digitaltutors, tv.adobe, tutsplus and many other sites. But,
doesn't matter, if the person watching them is close minding and blindly
hate any type of video tutorial, all these sites, no matter how good they
are will suck for this person...

Any, I think you two fled the point here. I didn't create this topic in
order to talk about "video vs text", if you guy want to continue this waste
of time, create a topic and talk everything you want. I'm done here, as I
said, PLURALITY is the key thing, don't try to impose what you think is
right and wrong.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/attachments/20140925/c93bc2d0/attachment.html>

More information about the Python-list mailing list