Lucky numbers in Python

Ian Kelly ian.g.kelly at gmail.com
Thu Apr 30 00:38:43 CEST 2015


On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Cecil Westerhof <Cecil at decebal.nl> wrote:
> Op Wednesday 29 Apr 2015 21:57 CEST schreef Ian Kelly:
>> And although it's not clear to me what this is supposed to be doing,
>> you probably no longer need the middle term if the intention is to
>> continue deleting all the way to the end of the list (if it is then
>> I think you have a bug in the existing implementation, since the
>> last item in the list can never be deleted).
>
> What do you mean by this? Executing:
>     lucky_numbers(5)
> gives:
>     [1, 3]
>
> So the last element (5) is deleted.

Off by one error on my part. This is why negative skip values on
ranges and slices are not recommended: they're confusing. :-)

In that case you can definitely omit the middle term of the slice,
which will be both more concise and clearer in intent, though probably
not significantly faster.



More information about the Python-list mailing list