breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Jan 20 03:46:01 CET 2015
On 20/01/2015 00:49, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Zachary Gilmartin
> <zacharygilmartin at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Why aren't there trees in the python standard library?
> Trees are kind of specialized datastructures; no one type of tree
> solves all tree-related problems suitably well.
> I think probably the most common need for a tree is implementing a
> cache, but most times you're tempted to sort inside a loop you're
> better off with a tree.
> I've put some time into python trees; most of them are on pypi and at:
I don't know if you've seen this http://kmike.ru/python-data-structures/
but maybe of interest.
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
More information about the Python-list