(side-)effects and ...
skip.montanaro at gmail.com
Fri Jul 10 16:05:48 CEST 2015
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:
> Even if it respects that, there's no way that Mailman can know to
> respect his ridiculous copyright restriction.
Well, sure. But Mailman is probably not alone in this regard. In case it
wasn't clear from Tony the Tiger's post (everything was wrapped in my
copy), here's how those headers all look in-the-raw:
X-Copyright: (C) Copyright 2015 Stefan Ram. All rights reserved.
Distribution through any means other than regular usenet
channels is forbidden. It is forbidden to publish this
article in the world wide web. It is forbidden to change
URIs of this article into links. It is forbidden to remove
this notice or to transfer the body without this notice.
X-No-Archive-Readme: "X-No-Archive" is only set, because this prevents some
services to mirror the article via the web (HTTP). But Stefan Ram
hereby allows to keep this article within a Usenet archive server
with only NNTP access without any time limitation.
So he's got five headers, two of which you would clearly expect mail
software to recognize (X-No-Archive and Archive), two which must be for
human consumption only (X-Copyright and X-No-Archive-Readme). I'm not sure
about X-No-Html. A quick Google search for that header returned nothing
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-list