str.index() and str.find() versus only list.index()
steve at pearwood.info
Tue Jul 14 05:23:44 CEST 2015
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 01:12 pm, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Roel Schroeven <roel at roelschroeven.net>
>> Quick question: why does str have both index() and find(), while list
>> only has index()? Is there a reason for that, or is it just an historical
> Historical accident, I think. If it were to be redone, I doubt that
> str.find would exist. The problem with it is that it returns -1 to
> indicate that the argument was not found, but -1 is a valid index into
> the string. This is a potential source of hard-to-find bugs.
Correct. But rather than removing it, it would be better to take a leaf out
of re.match's book and return None as the sentinel. That would eliminate
the "using -1 as a valid index" bug.
More information about the Python-list