Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?
zachary.ware+pylist at gmail.com
Sun Jul 19 04:48:36 CEST 2015
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:
> I understand the general problem quite well. But feeling that one would
> have to do a 2.7 backport after writing, editing, or reviewing a 3.x patch
> can discourage doing a review in the first place. I am at that point now
> with respect to Idle patches.
I wonder if it would be worth the significant one-time effort to port
IDLE to 2/3, so that future bugfixes/improvements don't require any
extra effort than testing them with all versions.
More information about the Python-list