Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?

Paul Rubin no.email at nospam.invalid
Sun Jul 19 05:45:53 CEST 2015


Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> writes:
> I am suggesting that if there are 10x as many 2.7only programmers as
> 3.xonly programmers, and none of the 2.7 programmers is willing to do
> the backport *of an already accepted patch*, then maybe it should not
> be done at all.

The patch acceptance/approval process is frankly daunting.


More information about the Python-list mailing list