Improve usage of Python 3
Terry Reedy
tjreedy at udel.edu
Wed Jul 15 05:33:31 EDT 2015
On 7/14/2015 12:28 PM, Marcos wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just like many, I want the projects in which I work on to move to Python 3.
>
> And incredibly, there are a few users on the same project who refuse to
> use python 3 simply because of the print statement.
>
> That has probably already been discussed, but since I actually couldn't
> find anything relevant about, I decided to ask here anyway.
>
> What are the changes of something like
>
> from __past__ import print_statement
0
> or to make both
>
> print
This already works, like any other name
>>> print
<built-in function print>
To add to what Chris said, this means that print can be rebound just
like any other name. For example:
>>> import builtins
>>> builtins.print
<built-in function print>
>>> def print(*args, **kwargs):
kwargs['sep'] = '|'
builtins.print(*args, **kwargs)
>>> print(1,2,3)
1|2|3
> and
>
> print()
>
> work on Python 3 ?
--
Terry Jan Reedy
More information about the Python-list
mailing list