Need Help w. PIP!
tjreedy at udel.edu
Wed Sep 9 07:53:11 CEST 2015
On 9/8/2015 6:19 PM, Cody Piersall wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
> <PointedEars at web.de <mailto:PointedEars at web.de>> wrote:
> > Cody Piersall wrote:
> > > Please respond to the list as well as the person you're actually
> > > to. It works out better for everyone that way. (You should just
> have to
> > > "reply all" instead of "reply").
[Reply] should send the reply to the list.
> > “Better” as in “getting/reading/downloading the same message *twice*”?
> > The rule of thumb is: write here, read here.
> Some people email the list, but aren't subscribed to it. So I guess a
> better rule is to just reply-to-all for the OP?
Please no, not as a routine. I intentionally read python-list as a
newsgroup via gmane.news.org so I can pick messages as I feel like
without my mailbox being flooded. Anyone who want to read responses to
something they send can do so via gmane. Also, [Reply All] tends to
collect multiple CC names, and most people don't have the curtesy to
properly prune it.
Terry Jan Reedy
More information about the Python-list