Python handles globals badly.
breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk
Sat Sep 12 06:17:36 CEST 2015
On 12/09/2015 05:06, Random832 wrote:
> Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk> writes:
>> On 12/09/2015 01:11, random832 at fastmail.us wrote:
>> If everything in Python is an object, how can it assign a pointer?
>> Especially how do Jython and IronPython assign pointers?
> The Java and .NET runtimes also have pointers, they just don't [usually]
> call them pointers, just like Python doesn't call them pointers (a match
> made in... well, somewhere starting with an H, for sure).
> Honestly, whether you want to call the thing a pointer or a reference,
> you have to call it *something*, and I think "reference" is a worse fit
> based on its connotations from C++. Whatever you call it, it's an arrow
> on a diagram.
I think pointer is even worse because of its connection with C and hence
cPython. What is wrong with object if that is the only thing Python
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
More information about the Python-list