True == 1 weirdness
invalid at invalid.invalid
Wed Sep 16 19:44:42 CEST 2015
On 2015-09-16, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 03:27 am, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2015-09-16, Sven R. Kunze <srkunze at mail.de> wrote:
>>> On 16.09.2015 18:57, Random832 wrote:
>>>> I think that chaining should be limited to:
>>>> A) all operators are "="
>>>> B) all operators are "is"
>> I'm not all that sure A and B should be allowed.
> You can take `x == y == z` off me when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.
Well, that case hadn't been mentioned yet. But, I agree that should be
added as case E and be allowed.
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! ... or were you
at driving the PONTIAC that
gmail.com HONKED at me in MIAMI last
More information about the Python-list