multiprocessing.pool.Pool.map should take more than one iterable
ycm.jason at gmail.com
ycm.jason at gmail.com
Fri Aug 26 16:19:47 EDT 2016
Hello all,
The official doc describes `Pool.map(func, iterable[, chunksize])` as "A parallel equivalent of the map() built-in function.".
Since the function signature of `map` is `map(function, iterable, ...)`, I hereby suggest that `Pool.map` should change its function signature to `Pool.map(function, iterable, ... [, chunksize])`. This will bring true equivalent to these functions.
Tell me what you think.
Pool.map: https://docs.python.org/3/library/multiprocessing.html#multiprocessing.pool.Pool.map
map: https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#map
Jason
More information about the Python-list
mailing list