Detect Linux Runlevel
best_lay at yahoo.com
Tue Dec 6 14:27:42 EST 2016
On Tue, 06 Dec 2016 13:06:35 -0600, Tim Chase wrote:
> On 2016-12-06 12:10, Wildman via Python-list wrote:
>> If I had tried this in the beginning, it would have
>> save you a lot of work.
>> Since both versions of the code works, which one do
>> you recommend? Or does it matter?
> Heh, I'm not sure it matters much. The code I provided should be
> expandable for tidily handling other entries in utmp, allowing you to
> search for other system events that might interest you (check out the
> invocation of the filter() function which filters by type).
Yes, your code is very expandable and I will keep it
archived for that reason. In the future I might want
to delve further into utmp. But right now all I need
is the runlevel.
> Since I've already done the leg-work, I mildly advocate using my
> version since it should be pretty clean and easy to expand. But if
> you want the satisfaction of using your code, I won't take offense :-)
Yes, I think I will use my code. No offense intended. :-)
Again, I do appreciate all your work on my behalf. I hope
some day I can return the favor.
<Wildman> GNU/Linux user #557453
The cow died so I don't need your bull!
More information about the Python-list