Metaclasses - magic functions
mr at e-wrobel.pl
Fri Dec 23 06:14:15 EST 2016
W dniu 21.12.2016 o 02:51, Ethan Furman pisze:
> On 12/20/2016 03:39 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>> "Mr. Wrobel" writes:
>>> Quick question, can anybody tell me when to use __init__ instead of
>>> __new__ in meta programming?
>> Use ‘__new__’ to do the work of *creating* one instance from nothing;
>> allocating the storage, determining the type, etc. — anything that will
>> be *the same* for every instance. ‘__new__’ is the constructor.
>> Use ‘__init__’ to do the work of *configuring* one instance, after it
>> already exists. Any attributes that are special to an instance should be
>> manipulated in the ‘__init__’ method. ‘__init__’ is the initialiser.
> That sounds like general object creation/class advice, which as a general
> guideline is okay, but don't feel like it's the most important thing.
> I only use `__new__` when the object being created is (or is based on)
> an immutable type; otherwise I use `__init__`. Likewise, if I'm using
> `__new__` then I do all my configuration in `__new__` unless I have a
> really good reason not to (such as making it easier for subclasses to
> modify/skip `__init__`).
> As far as metaclasses go... the only time I recall writing an `__init__`
> for a metaclass was to strip off the extra arguments so `type.__init__`
> wouldn't fail.
Hi,thanx for answers, let's imagine that we want to add one class
attribute for newly created classess with using __init__ in metaclass,
here's an example:
# __init__ manipulation:
def __init__(cls, name, bases, dct):
dct['added_in_init'] = 'test'
super(MetaClass, cls).__init__(name, bases, dct)
__metaclass__ = MetaClass
print("Lets print attributes added in __init__ in base classes:")
after running it: AttributeError: type object 'BaseClass' has no
Adding the same in __new__ works. Can anyone explain me please what's wrong?
More information about the Python-list