Garbage collection problem with generators

Haochuan Guo guohaochuan at gmail.com
Wed Dec 28 05:03:15 EST 2016


Anyone? The script to reproduce this problem is in:

https://gist.github.com/wooparadog/766f8007d4ef1227f283f1b040f102ef

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 8:39 PM Haochuan Guo <guohaochuan at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, everyone
>
> I'm building a http long polling client for our company's discovery
> service and something weird happened in the following code:
>
> ```python
> while True:
>     try:
>         r = requests.get("url", stream=True, timeout=3)
>         for data in r.iter_lines():
>             processing_data...
>     except TimeoutException:
>         time.sleep(10)
> ```
>
> When I deliberately times out the request and then check the connections
> with `lsof -p process`, I discover that there are *two active connections*(ESTABLISH)
> instead of one. After digging around, it turns out it might not be the
> problem with `requests` at all, but gc related to generators.
>
> So I write this script to demonstrate the problem:
>
> https://gist.github.com/wooparadog/766f8007d4ef1227f283f1b040f102ef
>
> Function `A.a` will return a generator which will raise an exception. And
> in function `b`, I'm building new a new instance of `A` and iterate over
> the exception-raising generator. In the exception handler, I'll close the
> generator, delete it, delete the `A` instance, call `gc.collect()` and do
> the whole process all over again.
>
> There's another greenlet checking the `A` instances by using
> `gc.get_objects()`. It turns out there are always two `A` instances.
>
> This is reproducible with python2.7, but not in python3.5. I've also tried
> with `thread` instead of `gevent`, it still happens. I'm guessing it's
> related to garbage collection of generators.
>
> Did I bump into a python2 bug? Or am I simply wrong about the way to close
> generators...?
>
> Thanks
>


More information about the Python-list mailing list