Reply to whom?
ben+python at benfinney.id.au
Wed Feb 3 22:18:03 EST 2016
Bernardo Sulzbach <mafagafogigante at gmail.com> writes:
> Mr. Finney, that would be Google itself.
Yep. You're the one who needs to interact with them because as a user of
the program, it's you they're trying to please (more than me, at least).
Can't work out how to interact with a corporation and get into
correspondence about a bug in their software? That's probably a good
sign you shouldn't be using their software :-)
> I have never bothered setting up a client such as Mutt and can't even
> name more than Outlook and Mutt.
You'll know your needs more than me. Maybe you could start with
Thunderbird (available in Debian as “Icedove” because of trademark
issues); that's a good all-round client that behaves well.
> I must say that the way you put it makes sense. A "reply" to the last
> message targeting its sender (the person that wrote it) is very
> reasonable indeed.
Thanks. This is a contentious issue, and some people want to mangle your
messages;but that doesn't mean it's still open for debate — one side is
\ “I cannot conceive that anybody will require multiplications at |
`\ the rate of 40,000 or even 4,000 per hour …” —F. H. Wales, 1936 |
More information about the Python-list