what is wrong with this property setter
Nagy László Zsolt
gandalf at shopzeus.com
Thu Jun 9 05:15:12 EDT 2016
>> Yes, and more. That property will also have a get method! Is it
> It's a logical effect of how the setter() method works. The above is
> syntactic sugar for
> def set_parent(...):
> set_parent = parent.setter(set_parent)
> and parent.setter() creates a new property basically like this
> def setter(self, fset):
> return property(self.fget, fset, ...)
This I could not find, because property is a built-in. But I believe
> Not very elegant, but I don't see a cleaner alternative.
It can be used to define an alternative setter for the same property,
but it is bad practice.
Thank you for the clarification.
More information about the Python-list