Can math.atan2 return INF?
Lawrence D’Oliveiro
lawrencedo99 at gmail.com
Thu Jun 30 03:16:12 EDT 2016
On Thursday, June 30, 2016 at 6:57:41 PM UTC+12, Paul Rubin wrote:
>> Every time somebody tries to point to an example of a “topic that is
>> beyond the reach of science”, it seems to get knocked over eventually.
>
> Generate a sequence of "random" bits from your favorite physical source
> (radioactive decay, quantum entanglement, or whatever). Is the sequence
> really algorithmically random (like in Kolmogorov randomness)? This is
> scientifically unknowable.
The definition of “random” is “unknowable”. So all you are stating is a tautology.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list