The Cost of Dynamism (was Re: Pyhon 2.x or 3.x, which is faster?)
Terry Reedy
tjreedy at udel.edu
Sun Mar 13 01:43:21 EST 2016
On 3/12/2016 8:20 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Yeah, we get it. The CPython interpreter is plenty fast enough for whatever
> you use it for. Good for you! Millions aren't so lucky. They are looking
> for something faster, because for them, you can never have too much speed.
> When you are trying to solve a 7000x7000 system of equations, you don't
> want to wait three days for a solution. Or three hours with Numpy.
There is a positive form of Parkinson's Law at work. People patience is
about the same as ever. So as computation gets faster, people attempt
larger problems. I remember when the idea of solving such a problem was
ludicrous.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
More information about the Python-list
mailing list