csjark module
bezenchu at gmail.com
bezenchu at gmail.com
Wed Sep 21 22:51:31 EDT 2016
On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 10:09:25 PM UTC+3, Peter Otten wrote:
> bezenchu at gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 5:15:38 PM UTC+3, Peter Otten wrote:
> >> bezenchu at gmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 3:17:11 PM UTC+3, Peter Otten
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> bezenchu at gmail.com wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 1:14:14 PM UTC+3, Peter Otten
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> bezenchu at gmail.com wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > After setting up csjark (http://csjark.readthedocs.io/), I'm
> >> >> >> > trying to test on of my C header files which has following
> >> >> >> > statements:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > typedef struct {
> >> >> >> > unsigned long X;
> >> >> >> > __int64 Y;
> >> >> >> > } abc;
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > If I'm changing __int64 to unsigned long I'm not getting this
> >> >> >> > error For the __int64 i'm getting the mention error. Am I missing
> >> >> >> > something?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > In addition, I'm getting following error:
> >> >> >> > Attribute error("'tuple object has no attibute 'children'",)
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > I'd be glad to have some assistance.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> It looks like development of csjark has stopped in 2011. Try
> >> >> >> installing a pycparser version from that time frame -- 2.05 should
> >> >> >> be a good candidate according to
> >> >> >> <https://github.com/eliben/pycparser/blob/master/CHANGES> so if you
> >> >> >> are using pip after
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> $ pip install pycparser==2.05
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> csjark might work.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I've installed all the required SW, but still getting the same error
> >> >>
> >> >> When you invoke the interactive interpreter what does
> >> >>
> >> >> >>> import pycparser
> >> >> >>> pycparser.__version__
> >> >> '2.05'
> >> >>
> >> >> produce on your system?
> >> >
> >> > I have version 2.07 (which is the one used for the development)
> >>
> >> For cjshark to work (or at least not fail in the way you observed) you
> >> need 2.5.
> >>
> >> 2.7 returns 2-tuples where 2.5 does not. Compare for example:
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/eliben/pycparser/blob/release_v2.07/pycparser/c_ast.py#L149
> >>
> >> def children(self):
> >> nodelist = []
> >> if self.name is not None: nodelist.append(("name", self.name))
> >> if self.subscript is not None: nodelist.append(("subscript",
> >> self.subscript))
> >> return tuple(nodelist)
> >>
> >> and
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/eliben/pycparser/blob/release_v2.05/pycparser/c_ast.py#L136
> >>
> >> def children(self):
> >> nodelist = []
> >> if self.name is not None: nodelist.append(self.name)
> >> if self.subscript is not None: nodelist.append(self.subscript)
> >> return tuple(nodelist)
> >>
> >> I wonder why you didn't just try what I suggested...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > This one solved the 2nd problem.
> >
> > Do you have any suggestions for the 1st one?
>
> Here's what I see from your original post:
>
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2016-September/714323.html
>
> So I have no idea what your "1st problem" might be. Can you restate it?
>
> You have to use text, pictures are removed.
Clarification with example:
I'm taking the complex_union_test.h file (which is one of the test files of csjark) and changing on line 8 from int to __int64 so the code is
#include "union_test.h"
#include "cenum_test.h"
typedef signed int BOOL;
typedef enum {TRUE, FALSE} bool_t;
typedef union {
__int64 int_member;
struct cenum_test cenum_test_member;
long long long_long_member;
BOOL bool_member;
bool_t bool_t_member;
short short_member;
} complex_union;
struct struct_with_complex_union {
complex_union complex_union_member;
bool_t bool_t_member;
union union_test union_test_member;
};
Now trying to execute the parsing and getting following error:
Skipped "headers\complex_union_test.":Win32 as it raised ParseError('headers\\complex_union_test.h:8: before: __int64',)
I have similar error with my .h file.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list