Temporary variables in list comprehensions
Antonio Caminero Garcia
tonycamgar at gmail.com
Mon Jan 9 14:15:59 EST 2017
On Sunday, January 8, 2017 at 7:53:37 PM UTC-8, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Suppose you have an expensive calculation that gets used two or more times in a
> loop. The obvious way to avoid calculating it twice in an ordinary loop is with
> a temporary variable:
> result = 
> for x in data:
> tmp = expensive_calculation(x)
> result.append((tmp, tmp+1))
> But what if you are using a list comprehension? Alas, list comps don't let you
> have temporary variables, so you have to write this:
> [(expensive_calculation(x), expensive_calculation(x) + 1) for x in data]
> Or do you? ... no, you don't!
> [(tmp, tmp + 1) for x in data for tmp in [expensive_calculation(x)]]
> I can't decide whether that's an awesome trick or a horrible hack...
> "Ever since I learned about confirmation bias, I've been seeing
> it everywhere." - Jon Ronson
Hello I saw some memoizing functions, in that sense you can use the functools.lru_cache decorator, that is even better if you have repeated elements in data.
# very NP-hard calculation
Hope that helps :)
More information about the Python-list