Python3.6 tkinter bug?

MRAB python at
Tue Jan 31 18:02:41 EST 2017

On 2017-01-31 22:34, Christian Gollwitzer wrote:
> Am 31.01.17 um 20:18 schrieb George Trojan - NOAA Federal:
>> Selection of button 'A' also selects button 'C'. Same goes for 'B' and 'D'.
>> I noticed that widget names have changed, which likely leads to the cause:
>>> /usr/local/Python-3.5.1/bin/python3
>> .140182648425776.140182647743208
>> .140182648425776.140182647841848
>> .140182648424152.140182648282080
>> .140182648424152.140182648282136
>>> /usr/local/Python-3.6.0/bin/python3
>> .!frame.!checkbutton
>> .!frame.!checkbutton2
>> .!frame2.!checkbutton
>> .!frame2.!checkbutton2
> The widget names look fine to, and the 3.6 naming is way better, because
> it can be used for debugging more easily. The behaviour you describe can
> have two reasons, a) the same widget can be packed twice b) the widgets
> use the same variable. In Tk, a widget does not need an associate
> variable - which can be done by setting the variable to an empty string,
> or by leaving this option off.
> Presumably Python 3.6 passes anything else than an empty string to Tk as
> the -variable option, maybe a mistranslated None? Can't test it myself,
> but in your example you could, for instance, check the output of
>, 'configure'), which lists you the Tk side configuration, or
>, 'configure', '-variable') to get specifically the bound
> variable.
Perhaps someone who knows Tcl and tk can tell me, but I notice that in 
the first example, the second part of the widget names are unique, 
whereas in the second example, the second part of the widget names are 
the reused (both "!checkbutton" and "!checkbutton2" occur twice). Is 
that the cause?

Do the names need to be:



More information about the Python-list mailing list