Benefits of unicode identifiers (was: Allow additional separator in identifiers)
Richard Damon
Richard at Damon-Family.org
Thu Nov 23 18:18:57 EST 2017
On 11/23/17 5:45 PM, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> On 23/11/17 23:15, Richard Damon wrote:
>> My thought is you define a legal only those Unicode characters that via
>> the defined classification would be normally legal, but perhaps the
>> first implementation doesn't diagnose many of the illegal combinations.
>> If that isn't Pythonic, then yes, implementing a fuller classification
>> would be needed. That might also say normalization questions would need
>> to be decided too.
>>
> You do realise that Python has a perfectly good definition of what's
> allowed in an identifier that is thoroughly grounded in the Unicode
> standard and works very well, right?
>
>
> -- Thomas
No, I wasn't aware that Python was already Unicode enabled in the source
code set. Still fairly new with it, but the fact that people seemed to
argue about doing it made me think it was allowed yet.
--
Richard Damon
More information about the Python-list
mailing list