Asynchronous processing is more efficient -- surely not?
paul.nospam at rudin.co.uk
Thu Apr 5 02:40:21 EDT 2018
Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python at pearwood.info> writes:
> So, I'm, still trying to wrap my brain around async processing, and I
> started reading this tutorial:
> and the very first paragraph broke my brain.
> "Asynchronous programming has been gaining a lot of traction in the past
> few years, and for good reason. Although it can be more difficult than
> the traditional linear style, it is also much more efficient."
> I can agree with the first part of the first sentence (gaining a lot of
> traction), and the first part of the second sentence (more difficult than
> the traditional style), but the second part? Asynchronous processing is
> *more efficient*?
It really depends on your definition of "efficient". Using async
generally introduces some overhead, so there's a cost. However it also
allows for the possibility of making better use of your compute
resources by doing useful work rather than idle-waiting for network
interactions to complete.
As with many things - it's a useful tool and can be used to your
advantage, but you can also shoot yourself in the foot if used
More information about the Python-list