Pylint false positives
Dan Sommers
dan at tombstonezero.net
Mon Aug 20 12:12:41 EDT 2018
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 14:39:38 +0000, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> If a class' methods don't use self, it probably shouldn't be a class.
Agreed.
> I have often wished Python had proper namespaces, so I didn't have to
> abuse classes as containers in this way :-(
>
> (Not that I do this using "inner classes", but I do often want to use
> a class as a container for functions, without caring about "self" or
> wrapping everything in staticmethod.)
Isn't that what modules are for? (I suspect that I'm missing something,
because I also suspect that you knew/know that.)
Dan
More information about the Python-list
mailing list