Pylint false positives
Marko Rauhamaa
marko at pacujo.net
Tue Aug 21 12:38:00 EDT 2018
Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz>:
> Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> Lexically, there is special access:
>>
>> class C:
>> def __init__(self, some, arg):
>> c = self
>> class D:
>> def method(self):
>> access(c)
>> access(some)
>> access(arg)
>
> [...]
>
> you can do that without creating a new class every time you want an
> instance. You just have to be *slightly* more explicit about the link
> between the inner and outer instances.
By "*slightly* more explicit," do you mean more syntactic clutter?
Because of course you replace inner classes and closures with top-level
classes and methods of top-level classes.
And of course, I would prefer not to create a class for a singleton
object:
class C:
def __init__(self, some, arg):
c = self
self.d = object:
def method(self):
access(c)
access(some)
access(arg)
Unfortunately, there is no such syntax in Python.
Marko
More information about the Python-list
mailing list