Guilty as charged
breamoreboy at gmail.com
Fri Jul 27 15:30:34 EDT 2018
On 27/07/18 17:23, Schachner, Joseph wrote:
> Re: "...while
> thing == None
> would work perfectly in almost all cases in practice, it's unidiomatic and suggests the writer isn't quite comfortable with the workings of the language"
> I admit, I've been a C++ programmer for many years and a Python programmer for only about 5 years. But, I did learn something here. I've read books on Python and somehow still did not know that None is guaranteed to be a singleton in all implementations, and that not only does "thing is None" therefore work (guaranteed), but that that is the Pythonic thing to do. ... Maybe I missed it, but I'll remember it now.
> --- Joseph S.
Your apology is accepted. Thank you.
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
More information about the Python-list