I'm getting a spamassassin party here
Gene Heskett
gheskett at shentel.net
Tue Jun 26 09:50:24 EDT 2018
On Tuesday 26 June 2018 02:50:01 Cameron Simpson wrote:
> On 24Jun2018 17:03, Gene Heskett <gheskett at shentel.net> wrote:
> >Greetings list;
> >
> >Generally spamassassin only gets picky about this occasionally, but
> > for the past several hours its working overtime on python list
> > messages, with the major problem being the servers time stamp, a day
> > or more in the past. Anyboy ever hear of ntpd?
> >-- Cheers, Gene Heskett
>
> Could you eyeball some of these problematic messages please?
>
> I've been noticing a swathe of messages in the past few days with
> From: headers like this:
>
> From: "Steven D'Aprano" <steven.d'aprano at 1:261/38.remove-ij1-this>
>
> where the From: has been badly mangled, I think by a usenet->list
> gateway. The Path: on these messages looks like this (give or take):
>
> Path:
> uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!n
>ews.snarked.org!news.bbs.nz!.POSTED.184-155-113-241.cpe.cableone.net!no
>t-for-mail
>
> I'd be interested to know if there is significant overlap between my
> problematic messages and yours.
>
> Cheers,
> Cameron Simpson <cs at cskk.id.au>
Stevens messages are among the most frequent spamassassin triggers. The
scoring diff that tips the scales is the time error:
1.0 DATE_IN_PAST_12_24 Date: is 12 to 24 hours before Received: date
There is also this:
0.5 APOSTROPHE_FROM From address contains an apostrophe
This list commits a whole menu of errors that spamassassin doesn't like.
The whole list from a different message:
Content analysis details: (5.6 points, 5.1 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail
domains are different
1.0 DATE_IN_PAST_12_24 Date: is 12 to 24 hours before Received: date
0.2 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
[score: 1.0000]
0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with
no rDNS
0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
Some of these should be fixable by proper configuration of the
listserver, but don't confuse me with an expert. I am subscribed to the
list.
--
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
More information about the Python-list
mailing list