The following modules appear to be missing ['_sysconfigdata']
songbird
songbird at anthive.com
Wed Jan 9 15:48:16 EST 2019
MRAB wrote:
> On 2019-01-09 14:56, songbird wrote:
>> Chris Angelico wrote:
>> ...
>>> You want it to work with minimal effort? Then forget about py2exe and
>>> just distribute your .py files. WAY easier.
>>
>> which then forces the work onto every other
>> person who might install it, if they are on a
>> different architecture or system it even gets
>> worse if you add in that they may need to figure
>> out how to get a C compiler installed and
>> available (if a bdist/wheel isn't available
>> because the developer couldn't figure out how
>> to generate one).
>>
>> for a novice user who just wants to get
>> something done this isn't a very good solution.
>>
>> a build farm for common architectures would
>> help a lot of developers avoid all this thrashing.
>>
> .py files work on any platform that supports Python: Windows, Linux,
> MacOs, ...
.py isn't the point as somehow the modules i am
using compile C code during the install. i'd be
happier if they didn't, but i don't have a way to
easily generate those files myself that i know of.
> How many platforms support .exe files that were compiled for Windows?
depends upon the versions...
i have some pretty ancient Windows/DOS programs
that work fine under dosbox in my Debian Linux testing
setup. i haven't checked them out lately though to
see if they're still runnable (good chance they're
ok). been busy with other things and besides i
finally moved the ancient spreadsheets from Multiplan
to Libreoffice.
songbird
More information about the Python-list
mailing list