New Python implementation
Ned Batchelder
ned at nedbatchelder.com
Sat Feb 13 19:51:28 EST 2021
On Saturday, February 13, 2021 at 7:19:58 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 11:14 AM Mr Flibble
> <fli... at i42.removethisbit.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > On 13/02/2021 23:30, Igor Korot wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > But most importantly - what is the reason for this ?
> > > I mean - what problems the actual python compiler produce?
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> >
> > I am creating neos as I need a performant scripting engine for my other major project "neoGFX" and I want to be able to support multiple popular scripting languages including Python.
> >
> Until you have actually produced a (mostly) compatible Python
> implementation, can you please stop making these repeated and baseless
> jabs at CPython's performance? You keep stating or hinting that
> CPython is somehow unnecessarily slow, but unless you have some code
> to back your claims, this is nothing but mudslinging.
>
> CPython is not as slow as you might think. And PyPy is highly
> efficient at what it does well. Show us that you can do better than
> these before you call them slow.
>
> At the absolute least, show that you have something that can run Python code.
>
> ChrisA
The OP has been making these claims on IRC for a while (at least two years). He has never cared to substantiate them, or even participate in a civil and detailed discussion. He is either 1) smarter than all of us, or 2) woefully under-informed, or 3) trolling. Our best course is to ignore him until he has code we can try.
--Ned.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list