walrus with a twist :+= or ...
arj.python at gmail.com
Thu Oct 28 03:13:47 EDT 2021
The proposal is very interesting, my only concern is readability
unless a team has a tool check and flag it out as a process.
Else i fear one day i'll be seeing =+_+= in Python code.
But jokes aside @Avi why would someone want to immediately add a 2
after walrus defining it? in :+=2
about <https://compileralchemy.github.io/> | blog
More information about the Python-list