ANN: Dogelog Runtime, Prolog to the Moon (2021)

Mostowski Collapse janburse at fastmail.fm
Wed Sep 15 09:36:58 EDT 2021


I am not testing this use-case. But a related
use-case might highlight why speed did never
hurt anybody.

Lets say you program a flying drone with Python,
and the measurement is from the drone sensor
and communication systems.

Lets say you are using the idle time between
measurements for some complex planning. It
is then not true that you have anyway

to wait for the measurement.

Hope this helps!

BTW: If somebody knows another Python implementation
I am happy to test this implementation as well.
I am assuming that the standard Python python.exe

I tested amounts to CPython? Not sure. And the
GraalVM is practically the same as JPython? Not
sure either.

> Opinion:   Anyone who is counting on Python 
> for truly fast compute speed is probably using 
> Python for the wrong purpose.  
> Here, we use Python to control Test Equipment, 
> to set up the equipment and ask for a measurement, 
> get it, and proceed to the next measurement; and 
> at the end produce a nice formatted report.  
> If we wrote the test script in C or Rust or 
> whatever it could not run substantially faster 
> because it is communicating with the test equipment, 
> setting it up and waiting for responses, and 
> that is where the vast majority of the time goes.  
> Especially if the measurement result requires 
> averaging it can take a while.  In my opinion 
> this is an ideal use for Python, not just because 
> the speed of Python is not important, but also 
> because we can easily find people who know Python, 
> who like coding in Python, and will join the 
> company to program in Python ... and stay with us.  
> 
> --- Joseph S.



More information about the Python-list mailing list