Mutating an HTML file with BeautifulSoup
dn
PythonList at DancesWithMice.info
Fri Aug 19 20:17:38 EDT 2022
On 20/08/2022 09.01, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Aug 2022 at 05:12, Barry <barry at barrys-emacs.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 19 Aug 2022, at 19:33, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> What's the best way to precisely reconstruct an HTML file after
>>> parsing it with BeautifulSoup?
>>
>> I recall that in bs4 it parses into an object tree and loses the detail of the input.
>> I recently ported from very old bs to bs4 and hit the same issue.
>> So no it will not output the same as went in.
>>
>> If you can trust the input to be parsed as xml, meaning all the rules of closing
>> tags have been followed. Then I think you can parse and unparse thru xml to
>> do what you want.
>>
>
>
> Yeah, no I can't, this is HTML 4 with a ton of inconsistencies. Oh
> well. Thanks for trying, anyhow.
>
> So I'm left with a few options:
>
> 1) Give up on validation, give up on verification, and just run this
> thing on the production site with my fingers crossed
> 2) Instead of doing an intelligent reconstruction, just str.replace()
> one URL with another within the file
> 3) Split the file into lines, find the Nth line (elem.sourceline) and
> str.replace that line only
> 4) Attempt to use elem.sourceline and elem.sourcepos to find the start
> of the tag, manually find the end, and replace one tag with the
> reconstructed form.
>
> I'm inclined to the first option, honestly. The others just seem like
> hard work, and I became a programmer so I could be lazy...
+1 - but I've noticed that sometimes I have to work quite hard to be
this lazy!
Am assuming that http -> https is not the only 'change' (if it were,
you'd just do that without BS). How many such changes are planned/need
checking? Care to list them?
--
--
Regards,
=dn
More information about the Python-list
mailing list