an oop question
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Fri Nov 4 20:47:30 EDT 2022
On 5/11/22 4:25 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Maybe it's one of those terms that is useless for actual coding
> (because practicality beats purity), but good for discussions?
I'm not sure it's much good for discussions, either. I don't
really care whether a language is "purely OO" or not, whatever
that means, because I don't see purity of OO as a virtue.
All I care about is what actual features then language has.
--
Greg
More information about the Python-list
mailing list