Configuring an object via a dictionary
Loris Bennett
loris.bennett at fu-berlin.de
Mon Mar 18 02:42:32 EDT 2024
Tobiah <toby at tobiah.org> writes:
> I should mention that I wanted to answer your question,
> but I wouldn't actually do this. I'd rather opt for
> your self.config = config solution. The config options
> should have their own namespace.
>
> I don't mind at all referencing foo.config['option'],
> or you could make foo.config an object by itself so
> you can do foo.config.option. You'd fill it's attributes
> in the same way I suggested for your main object.
Thanks for the thoughts. I'll go for self.config = config after
all, since, as you say, the clutter caused by the referencing is not
that significant.
Cheers,
Loris
--
This signature is currently under constuction.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list