Two python issues

Raymond Boute raymond.boute at pandora.be
Tue Nov 5 09:48:07 EST 2024


L.S.,

Python seem to suffer from a few poor design decisions regarding strings 
and lists that affect the elegance of the language.

(a) An error-prone "feature" is returning -1 if a substring is not found 
by "find", since -1 currently refers to the last item. An example:

 >>> s = 'qwertyuiop'
 >>> s[s.find('r')]
'r'
 >>> s[s.find('p')]
'p'
 >>> s[s.find('a')]
'p'
 >>>

If "find" is unsuccessful, an error message is the only clean option.
Moreover, using index -1 for the last item is a bad choice: it should be 
len(s) - 1 (no laziness!).
Negative indices should be reserved for elements preceding the element 
with index 0 (currently not implemented, but a must for orthogonal 
design supporting general sequences).

(b) When using assignment for slices, only lists with the same length as 
the slice should be acceptable, otherwise an error should be given.  
Anything that re-indexes items not covered by the slice is against the 
essential idea of assignment. For changes that imply re-indexing (e.g., 
inserting a list longer than the slice), Python offers cleaner solutions.

Comments are welcome.

With best regards,

Raymond



More information about the Python-list mailing list