[Python-mode] evil underscore as word
Stephen J. Turnbull
stephen at xemacs.org
Tue Dec 6 09:50:03 CET 2005
>>>>> "Ben" == Ben Wing <ben at 666.com> writes:
Ben> btw is anyone maintaining python-mode?
Yes.
despite the following comment:
;; For historical reasons, underscore is word class instead of
;; symbol class. GNU conventions say it should be symbol class, but
;; there's a natural conflict between what major mode authors want
;; and what users expect from `forward-word' and `backward-word'.
;; Guido and I have hashed this out and have decided to keep
;; underscore in word class. If you're tempted to change it, try
;; binding M-f and M-b to py-forward-into-nomenclature and
;; py-backward-into-nomenclature instead. This doesn't help in all
;; situations where you'd want the different behavior
;; (e.g. backward-kill-word).
(modify-syntax-entry ?\_ "w" py-mode-syntax-table)
imho it is *not* acceptable to have a random deviation like this.
python is no different from c, perl, etc. in its treatment of
underscores and should absolutely not have such a gratuitous
incompatibility. there's a reason why backward-word and backword-sexp
don't do the same thing; if you want to move by entire identifier, use
the latter. with _ as symbol, you have a choice; with _ as word,
there's no way to [e.g.] delete a single word of an identifier like
`word_with_final_syllable'.
ben
--
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
More information about the Python-mode
mailing list