From zubin.mithra at gmail.com Sat Dec 4 07:40:10 2010
From: zubin.mithra at gmail.com (Zubin Mithra)
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 12:10:10 +0530
Subject: [Python-porting] SGML parsing
Message-ID: <AANLkTik6Nzr4cV9_fbJNt40XkBL1N2FEar-T9_FTou+6@mail.gmail.com>
Hey everyone,
I was trying to port feedparser over to Python3.1 and I realized that
sgmllib had been deprecated from Python2.7 upward and subsequently removed.
Which alternatives would you suggest I use in Python3.1 to perform analogous
tasks?
Thanks,
zm
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-porting/attachments/20101204/7c2e0183/attachment.html>
From merwok at netwok.org Sat Dec 4 15:59:13 2010
From: merwok at netwok.org (=?UTF-8?B?w4lyaWMgQXJhdWpv?=)
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 15:59:13 +0100
Subject: [Python-porting] SGML parsing
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik6Nzr4cV9_fbJNt40XkBL1N2FEar-T9_FTou+6@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTik6Nzr4cV9_fbJNt40XkBL1N2FEar-T9_FTou+6@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4CFA5741.5090709@netwok.org>
Hi Zubin,
I don?t know about 3.1, but in 3.2 the html.parser module has very
recently received improvements to make it more lax when needed, with
Beautiful Soup cited as example:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-checkins/2010-December/100097.html
Apart from that, people say that lxml is the new Beautiful Soup.
Cheers
From gregfjohnson at yahoo.com Mon Dec 20 07:38:34 2010
From: gregfjohnson at yahoo.com (Greg Johnson)
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:38:34 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [Python-porting] help needed porting stuff to Python 3?
Message-ID: <589872.9492.qm@web33503.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Very new to this mail list; sorry if I am asking naive questions!
Are there modules that still need to be ported to Python 3?
If so (and my impression is that there are), how would I go about exploring how to help?
I'm an experienced (i.e., "gray-haired" ;-)) programmer, somewhat new to Python.
Would be delighted to help in any way possible in ongoing porting efforts.
What about the OpenGL Python modules Pyglet and PyOpenGL? Are there ongoing efforts that I could join or start participating in?
Or would there be something else that people would suggest looking at?
Thanks a million,
Greg
From regebro at gmail.com Mon Dec 20 11:21:51 2010
From: regebro at gmail.com (Lennart Regebro)
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:21:51 +0100
Subject: [Python-porting] help needed porting stuff to Python 3?
In-Reply-To: <589872.9492.qm@web33503.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <589872.9492.qm@web33503.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTik3Rw06+w3ySDSe=+3OfVA9j52WL+R-HjQfSrbf@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 07:38, Greg Johnson <gregfjohnson at yahoo.com> wrote:
> What about the OpenGL Python modules Pyglet and PyOpenGL? ?Are there ongoing efforts that I could join or start participating in?
I don't think anyone here has a list of every project being ported.
You'll have to ask the maintainers of those modules. I'm sure they
will appreciate the help.
> Or would there be something else that people would suggest looking at?
Nah. Go with what you use and think is good.
From martin at v.loewis.de Mon Dec 20 11:26:27 2010
From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=)
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:26:27 +0100
Subject: [Python-porting] help needed porting stuff to Python 3?
In-Reply-To: <589872.9492.qm@web33503.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <589872.9492.qm@web33503.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <4D0F2F53.7060400@v.loewis.de>
> Or would there be something else that people would suggest looking at?
There is a list of projects that people would like to see ported:
http://www.python.org/
http://www.python.org/3kpoll
That doesn't mean that maintainers of these packages necessarily welcome
porting activities - only that users of the packages would
like to see them ported.
Regards,
Martin
From qgallet at gmail.com Mon Dec 20 11:31:35 2010
From: qgallet at gmail.com (Quentin Gallet)
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:31:35 +0100
Subject: [Python-porting] help needed porting stuff to Python 3?
In-Reply-To: <589872.9492.qm@web33503.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <589872.9492.qm@web33503.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTikQQq7P2KbcmiX2xXC2Psh8361f4ai53ELj-8cf@mail.gmail.com>
>
> Or would there be something else that people would suggest looking at?
>
There was a similar discussion on python-dev 3 weeks ago:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-December/106228.html
Useful links are provided, including the poll Martin gave you.
Cheers,
Quentin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-porting/attachments/20101220/c00b2c35/attachment.html>