[python-uk] Unit Testing Framework

John J Lee jjl at pobox.com
Wed Mar 24 11:34:18 EST 2004

On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Francis Moore wrote:
> From: Chris Withers [mailto:lists at simplistix.co.uk]
[re doctest]
> > Bah humbug.
> > I believe code should be in code, even if it is testing code.
> You're right. I wouldn't want to use doctest to replace a proper set of
> unit tests.  However, for example code or a quick hack, it's ideal.

Tim says it's designed for testing documentation, not for testing code
(though maybe he's been persuaded it's useful for code too, by now...).


More information about the python-uk mailing list