[python-uk] Salt Stack meetup drink in London
Rachid Belaid
rachid.belaid at gmail.com
Fri Nov 30 01:09:11 CET 2012
I m not a Puppet users but a Chef one.
Initially I was considering that the language behind the conf management
didn't matter.
But I realise that it affect my understanding of the tool because I m not
able to read the source code as easily that I can do in most of Python tool
that I use to understand their inside mechanism.
And even If I can read ruby to some extend of some black magic, it leaves
me dependent on what the documentation provide me. I personally feel the
need of tool that I can own.
Since a year that I follow this project, I amaze by the progress that they
have done by a keeping a tool easy to get started.
R.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 11:39 PM, John Lee <jjl at pobox.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, Rachid Belaid wrote:
>
> Hello,
>>
>> I have been in touch with the people behind Salt Stack :
>> http://saltstack.org/
>>
>> One of the developers is coming next week to do some training on Salt.
>>
> [...]
>
> The usual suspect in this field is puppet. Puppet has a lot of users, so
> presumably a lot of canned, working configuration components. So, a
> question for those more clued-in than me about puppet: What problems does
> it leave us with -- through omission or commission -- that Salt Stack
> solves, or might solve? Problems *other than* not being written in Python!
>
> (Like perhaps lots of people, I've worked with in house home-grown
> puppet-like systems, but not puppet itself.)
>
> The github readme focuses more on features than the problems that it
> solves over the status quo, and does not mention puppet, but hints at
> problems in other systems with:
>
> * covering the whole range from small to large numbers of hosts
>
> * working with multiple geographical sites
>
> and in the Randall Schwartz interview video, I think these were mentioned:
>
> * execution time for operations on large numbers of hosts, and where
> the command to run depends on information gathered from those hosts
> rather than from a central database
>
> * lack of polymorphism across systems (example mentioned was a
> generic "install this package" command in Salt)
>
> * verbosity of puppet configurations
>
>
> If you consider being written in Python significant (and I guess I do, to
> some extent) the same question goes for bcfg2, and any other similar tools
> written in Python. And also for <favourite deployment system here>!
>
>
> John
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> python-uk mailing list
> python-uk at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/python-uk<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk>
>
--
Rach Belaid
Director at Iron Braces Ltd
Flat 9 240B Amhurst Road, London N16 7UL
Phone : +44 75 008 660 84
VAT : 114 2764 36
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-uk/attachments/20121130/770e6fe6/attachment.html>
More information about the python-uk
mailing list