[python-uk] The perils of reply-to

Stestagg stestagg at gmail.com
Thu Jan 3 16:47:31 CET 2013


I'm for keeping it, reply-to-list is easier for me, and definitely more
entertaining, at times

Steve

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Daniele Procida <daniele at vurt.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013, Jon Ribbens <jon+python-uk at unequivocal.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 11:40:51AM +0000, Andy Robinson wrote:
> >> In the light of this morning's, er, entertainment, are the Python
> >> developers on this list (well, all but one of them...) happy with the
> >> way it currently works?
> >
> >No. Reply-to-list is almost never correct. There is even less excuse
> >than usual (which would be almost none) on a "technical" list.
>
> You have to admit it's more entertaining.
>
> Daniele
>
> _______________________________________________
> python-uk mailing list
> python-uk at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-uk/attachments/20130103/99bf26af/attachment.html>


More information about the python-uk mailing list