[python-uk] The perils of reply-to

[Michael]

On 3 January 2013 23:24, Daniele Procida <daniele at vurt.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013, Michael <sparks.m at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Or is he wrong about your apparent obstinate belief in your desires ?
>>(I personally would have said petulant)
>
> That's uncalled-for.
>
> It would be gauche to end up trading insults over reply-to settings, and we don't want to be gauche, do we?

Very true. I didn't view it or intend it that way, but can see how it
could be. Maybe I've just seen this argument too many times.


Michael.