[python-uk] The perils of reply-to

[Jon Ribbens]

On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 11:40:54PM +0000, Michael wrote:
> On 3 January 2013 23:24, Daniele Procida <daniele at vurt.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013, Michael <sparks.m at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Or is he wrong about your apparent obstinate belief in your desires ?
> >>(I personally would have said petulant)
> >
> > That's uncalled-for.
> >
> > It would be gauche to end up trading insults over reply-to
> > settings, and we don't want to be gauche, do we?
> 
> Very true. I didn't view it or intend it that way, but can see how it
> could be. Maybe I've just seen this argument too many times.

Makes one wonder why you're trying to have it again then really.