[python-win32] WMI troubles!
Tim Roberts
timr at probo.com
Fri Jan 15 20:47:23 CET 2010
Alex Hall wrote:
>
> I do not want a single script because, eventually, the plan is to have
> a keystroke for core 1, a keystroke for core 2, a keystroke for
> percent of ram used, a keystroke for hard disk space, and so on. While
> I could write each function in its own script and put a hotkey on each
> one, it seems easier and faster to just make one script and run it
> once, avoiding the delay I always get when this script runs for the
> first time from happening each time I press a hotkey.
I guess that depends on how you define "easier" and "faster". For
development time, it's certainly going to be faster to create a set of
small, self-contained, single-purpose scripts that start, run, and end,
than it is to figure out the twisty paths involved in Windows hooks.
This is very much like the trade-off between writing CGI scripts and
writing a full-blown web application. It's a lot quicker to get a CGI
script up and running.
Yes, there is a short delay when starting a Python app, but after the
interpreter has been loaded once, it should stay in the file cache, so
subsequent loads go faster.
--
Tim Roberts, timr at probo.com
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.
More information about the python-win32
mailing list