[Python.NET] anonymous types from bug tracker
barton at bcdesignswell.com
Sun Apr 22 20:22:35 CEST 2012
Indeed, the mailing list gets more attention than the tracker. I do,
however, maintain the tracker as often as I am able.
As the submitter suggests:
In method GenericUtil.Register(Type t) there is no test for types which
t.Namespace is null.
Simple correction is just check if t.Namespace is null and then don`t
process that type.
I've had this on my list of things to commit to the trunk, but have
gotten sidetracked (by, among other things, building up a new Arch Linux
system). I will do my best to get to my list as quickly as I can.
Thank you so very much,
On 04/22/2012 09:22 AM, Stephen P. Lepisto wrote:
> Can you provide a simple reproduction case?
> On 4/21/2012 1:36 PM, Bradley Friedman wrote:
>> Hi all.
>> So I ran into what looks like a bug. Someone else logged it on the
>> sourceforge bug tracker.
>> I worked around it as the submitter suggests. However, I have two
>> Firstly, is the bug tracker the right place to deal with these things?
>> Or is this mailing list the right place. I ask because the referenced
>> bug doesn't seem to have been looked at all that much.
>> Second, is the suggested work around the correct course of action?
>> Should pythonnet ignore anonymous types?
>> Bradley Friedman
>> VFX and Animation
>> Consulting and Technology
>> brad at fie.us
>> Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet at python.org
More information about the PythonDotNet