[Pythonmac-SIG] Package Manager idea, adding a URL scheme
Just van Rossum
just at letterror.com
Fri Oct 3 13:44:42 EDT 2003
Bob Ippolito wrote:
> I think Jack is thinking too much about source package installs,
> while you and I are focused on binary package installs? The binary
> ones are the real win of PackMan, and the source package installs
> would be icing on the cake, mostly.
Yes. I'd even go so far as to not support source installs at all...
Who needs source installs? I think it's only people who (for example)
have their own private extension modules that extend Numeric. That
should be a _very_ small group of people, and a rather savvy group at
that: they might as well install Numeric without PackMan.
Here's an issue that I'm not totally clear about: there are packages
that need external frameworks, I think wxPython and Tcl/Tk are the main
examples here. Are these special cases, or does PackMan need to
_generally_ support installing external libraries? If the latter, what
kind of consequences does that have for cross-platform support? Is that
a reasonable goal/requirement at all?
More information about the Pythonmac-SIG