[Pythonmac-SIG] Re: Python Framework vs 'traditional' was Re: version numbers and dependencies

[Markus Weissmann]

On Dec 17, 2004, at 16:58, Bob Ippolito wrote:

>
> On Dec 17, 2004, at 10:26 AM, Markus Weissmann wrote:
>
>> On Dec 17, 2004, at 16:04, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, default on darwin/mac os x is what we both meant :)
>>
>> did someone already tried to compile python 2.4 with  
>> --enable-framework _and_ tried
>> to destroot the install?
>> It seems utterly broken - some stuff relies on already installed  
>> files which are - of course -
>> not yet in the installdir but inside the destroot...
>>
>> ./python.exe ./Mac/scripts/BuildApplet.py \
>>         --python  
>> /opt/local/Python.framework/Versions/2.4/Resources/Python.app/ 
>> Contents/MacOS/Python \
>>         --output  
>> /opt/darwinports/dports/lang/python24/work/destroot/Applications/ 
>> MacPython-2.4/BuildApplet.app \
>>         ./Mac/scripts/BuildApplet.py
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
> ----
>> IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:  
>> '/opt/local/Python.framework/Versions/2.4/Resources/Python.app/ 
>> Contents/MacOS/Python'
>
> That's going to be a mess to fix, bundlebuilder is an ugly mess of  
> code that never really worked quite right in the first place -- which  
> is why py2app exists.  Current versions of py2app would have a similar  
> problem, though, because for "lightweight" semi-standalone application  
> bundles it would expect to find the Python runtime in its current  
> location, not its future location.  I'll see about adding an option  
> similar to "--python" that allows you to override its preference for a  
> Python runtime location before py2app 0.1.7 is released.
>
> For now, I would recommend not running "make frameworkinstallextras".   
> The "extras" it installs are mostly garbage anyway (an Applet building  
> tool that doesn't quite work very well, an ancient IDE without syntax  
> highlighting, etc.), most of them won't work unless WASTE was around  
> during compile time (which it probably isn't), and we're not losing  
> any functionality from the current default build style.
>

ok - I did a "make frameworkinstall" - is there a straight way to  
suppress installing the extras?


-mww

---
Markus W. Weissmann
http://www.mweissmann.de/
http://www.opendarwin.org/~mww/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythonmac-sig/attachments/20041217/d0f9ccc9/PGP.pgp