[Pythonmac-SIG] Problems with pimp in 2.3.4

[Bob Ippolito]

On Jul 7, 2004, at 7:21 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:

>
> On 7-jul-04, at 13:15, Michael Hudson wrote:
>
>> Bob Ippolito <bob at redivi.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Jul 6, 2004, at 4:55 PM, Jack Jansen wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6 Jul 2004, at 00:05, Markus Neff wrote:
>>>>> I just tried the GUI Package manager and pimp.py and both seem as
>>>>> they would work now. Before I go on, please allow one further
>>>>> question: is it possible to install the listed binary packages into
>>>>> any Python 2.3.x version (binary compatibility)?
>>>>
>>>> That is definitely the intention of Python micro-releases, so if
>>>> this isn't the case please let me know.
>>>
>>> But it isn't necessarily the case.  Each .so will have a mach-o load
>>> command pointing to some particular Python path, except when using 
>>> the
>>> -undefined dynamic_lookup linker flag on 10.3.  Has that linking 
>>> style
>>> been backported to any 2.3.x release?
>>
>> But the paths should be the same for any 2.3.x release -- there's a
>> lot of the moral equivalent of sys.version[:3] going on in computing
>> paths in Python...
>>
>> Or have I missed something?
>
> Extensions are not interchangeable between pythons with a different 
> --prefix.

Such as /System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework, 
/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework, 
~/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework, or 
@executable_path/../Frameworks/Python.framework.

-bob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2357 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pythonmac-sig/attachments/20040707/ded2da12/smime.bin