[Pythonmac-SIG] Re: [ANN] PyMacApp - Flexible Executable Stub For
Python (v0.2)
Bob Ippolito
bob at redivi.com
Fri Mar 5 12:51:53 EST 2004
On Mar 5, 2004, at 12:38 PM, Donovan Preston wrote:
>
> On Mar 5, 2004, at 12:31 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>
>> One could build an application on Panther with a Python 2.3.x that
>> was *very carefully* built to ensure 10.1+ or 10.2+ compatibility,
>> but that's beyond the scope of what I'm trying to do right now. If
>> you had such a Python environment already, it would work.
>
> Couldn't you just include a 2.3.x framework in the bundle? Isn't that
> one of the points of this? Or are you saying the 2.3.x framework build
> would have to be built carefully in order to work on 10.1 or 10.2?
The 2.3.x framework build *and any extensions you use* would have to be
built carefully in order to work on 10.1 and/or 10.2.
By default, any extension you compile on 10.3 *may not* work on an
earlier version of OS X, even if the Python framework itself is
compatible with earlier versions of the OS.
Building backwards compatible things requires a complicated and
carefully configured development environment, and I am relatively
certain that nobody has yet gone through the trouble to set it up for
building Python extensions. I have a pretty good idea of how exactly
to do it -- however, I have more pressing issues to tackle right now,
like making things work smoothly on the *current* version of OS X. If
someone were to say, pay for me to do it, I would shift my priorities a
bit... but right now I have very little sympathy for people who run or
need to support non-current versions of OS X.
-bob
More information about the Pythonmac-SIG
mailing list