[Pythonmac-SIG] appscript terminology caching

Eric Nieuwland eric.nieuwland at xs4all.nl
Tue Oct 19 17:44:47 CEST 2004


On 19-okt-04, at 17:15, Bob Ippolito wrote:
> On Oct 19, 2004, at 11:03, Eric Nieuwland wrote:
>> On 19-okt-04, at 15:15, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>>> On Oct 19, 2004, at 4:51, Eric Nieuwland wrote:
>>>> On 18-okt-04, at 11:21, Jack Jansen wrote:
>>>>> On 18 Oct 2004, at 00:47, Eric Nieuwland wrote:
>>>>>> How will the caching system handle updates to an application of 
>>>>>> which the terminology is cached?
>>>>>
>>>>> That's one of the problems we're trying to sort out. Has wants to 
>>>>> do it automatically whereas Bob and myself seem to tend towards a 
>>>>> more manual solution, whereby the script writer somehow explicitly 
>>>>> triggers it.
>>>>
>>>> Why not add a parameter to the indicate whether or not to check for 
>>>> changes if the terminology is cached?
>>>> You'll have to rely on version numbers in the app to decide if the 
>>>> app was updated, but that should be OK.
>>>
>>> The reason cached terminologies are useful is because *asking* for 
>>> terminologies is slow.  If you have to ask if it's updated, you 
>>> might as well not have cached it in the first place.  If you don't 
>>> ask if it's updated, then it's impossible to know for sure whether 
>>> or not your cached terminology is stale.
>>
>> OK. But to check the version you can access the app's Info.plist. Is 
>> that slow as well?
>
> Info.plist isn't guaranteed to change when the application does.  
> Heck, it's not even totally guaranteed to exist (remote apple events, 
> CFM apps, OS9 apps running in Classic).

:-(

Would adding a parameter with values 'always', 'if there is none', 
'never' to control when the terminology is to be generated do the 
trick?



More information about the Pythonmac-SIG mailing list